According to the shenzhen traffic police department, in 2015, shenzhen achieved a decrease in both the total number of traffic accidents and the number of deaths, but the number of people killed in motor-related traffic accidents was 114, accounting for 24.77% of the total number of deaths, and the casualty rate was significantly higher than other traffic accidents. Obviously, the original intention of shenzhen's "motorcycle ban and electricity restriction" rectification action is two: one is to reduce the incidence of traffic accidents and ensure road traffic safety; The second is to crack down on illegal operations, maintain the order of road traffic operations and services, and ensure the safety of public travel.

  But the legal basis for such a massive ban campaign is shaky. Shenzhen traffic police said in a public response on April 5 that it is their statutory duty to investigate and punish motorcycle and electric bicycle traffic safety violations in accordance with the existing "road traffic safety law" and "Shenzhen Special Economic Zone road traffic safety management regulations". However, according to the interpretation of the provisions, whether the traffic control department can all or most of the trunk sections of the implementation of long-term traffic ban or restrictions measures? Can the traffic control department restrict or prohibit only "motorcycles, electric vehicles, electric bicycles and other non-motor vehicles" according to the prevailing road conditions? Due to the fuzziness of legislation itself and the lack of legality review of local legislation at present, such disputes continue to exist. In addition, several documents used by Shenzhen to ban motorcycles and limit electricity are of relatively low rank and belong to normative documents. As an important reference standard for the future development of the whole city, is such a basis not scientific and rigorous?

  According to the shenzhen traffic police department, in 2015, shenzhen achieved a decrease in both the total number of traffic accidents and the number of deaths, but the number of people killed in motor-related traffic accidents was 114, accounting for 24.77% of the total number of deaths, and the casualty rate was significantly higher than other traffic accidents. Obviously, the original intention of shenzhen's "motorcycle ban and electricity restriction" rectification action is two: one is to reduce the incidence of traffic accidents and ensure road traffic safety; The second is to crack down on illegal operations, maintain the order of road traffic operations and services, and ensure the safety of public travel.

  But the legal basis for such a massive ban campaign is shaky. Shenzhen traffic police said in a public response on April 5 that it is their statutory duty to investigate and punish motorcycle and electric bicycle traffic safety violations in accordance with the existing "road traffic safety law" and "Shenzhen Special Economic Zone road traffic safety management regulations". However, according to the interpretation of the provisions, whether the traffic control department can all or most of the trunk sections of the implementation of long-term traffic ban or restrictions measures? Can the traffic control department restrict or prohibit only "motorcycles, electric vehicles, electric bicycles and other non-motor vehicles" according to the prevailing road conditions? Due to the fuzziness of legislation itself and the lack of legality review of local legislation at present, such disputes continue to exist. In addition, several documents used by Shenzhen to ban motorcycles and limit electricity are of relatively low rank and belong to normative documents. As an important reference standard for the future development of the whole city, is such a basis not scientific and rigorous?